Msg From Fat Daddios On Testing Our Pans

Decorating By GregSkipper Updated 29 May 2008 , 4:32am by leah_s

Petit-four Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
Petit-four Posted 27 May 2008 , 10:04pm
post #61 of 90

I spent about 45 minutes on the phone with Greg Skipper. I have his permission to share our email exchange with you all.

I'd like leave the decision about buying up to all CC members. This was, and always was, my intent.

I am now working to clarify why my post was censored.

Thanks to all who PM'd and emailed support!

Petit-four



Dear Greg:

Thanks for your recent post on Cake Central.

My evaluation of the pan was simply a reflection of what a local cake shop sold. Just as a food critic visits a restaurant and does not ask for "special" service, my purchases (the Magic Line was from an on-line store) reflected what an average customer would receive. If you read my post carefully, you will see I also noted some problems with the Magic Line pans (such as difficulty in cleaning them by hand). In many areas your pans were rated as superior to Magic Line. The experiment I conducted was fair, given that no accompanying information regarding baking temperature was given to me when I bought the pan from a local cake shop.

Most importantly, as I am sure you know, bakers, whether in production bakeries, small custom shops, or at home, value fewer crumbs. I baked another set of cakes (cinnamon, scratch recipe) at 320. I had similar results: more crumbs, and a longer baking time.

As I mentioned in one of my posts, I suspected the crowning was due to the temperature being rather too high. However, if FD pans do require temperatures as low as 300 degrees, I would strongly encourage the company to provide some accompanying literature about the requirements. As you can see, none of the 1600+ readers (myself included) ever mentioned receiving any information about this. Only one post mentioned using a lower temperature, and she had to find the information herself. And, as you know, convection ovens have become much more common in home and small shop kitchens.

Regarding the information about aluminum transfer, you may wish to review the Alzheimer's Society's public health article, which concludes, "The overwhelming medical and scientific opinion is that the findings outlined above do not convincingly demonstrate a causal relationship between aluminium and Alzheimer's disease, and that no useful medical or public health recommendations can be made, at least at present." http://www.alzheimers.org.uk/s.....umentID=99 However, I do applaud you for bringing up this health issue.

Another point of concern to me is that Magic Line pans clearly state where they are manufactured; indeed, it is indelibly etched on the pan: "Made in USA." The Fad Daddios pan I purchased had only a sticker on it "Made in China." I would strongly suggest, since you note that "our process actually costs us more money to manufacture" that you provide evidence to the decorating community that your factories are staffed with individuals compliant with FDA health codes, and workers are paid appropriately.

I'd also like to add I am in no way affiliated with Magic Line, nor any other brand of cake product manufacturer. I would like to share my concerns with the CC community, as well.

Sincerely,
Kathy (Petit-four)

Here's his reply:

Kathy,

I appreciate your email and how well thought out and executed your experiment was. Please understand I am not bashing you at all and I apologize to you if that is how it came across. On the contrary I am quite respectful of your experiment and your time in conducting it. I just wanted to reply accordingly as I need to be fair to my company and brand and make sure our customers are aware of differences. I did note where we rated well in some areas. I was just trying to do my part to explain possible reasons for areas where we clearly lacked a âgood gradeâ.

You couldnât be more correct in informing our customers of baking temperature differences. In fact, we just started labeling our pans and this information will be appearing on those labels. I should have known better by not doing that before. I likely could have eliminated many of these issues. I have received a huge influx of emails since this morning and have heard from several people who like the pans and have stated they even bake with our pans at 275 in convection with excellent color, consistency, and release. I am not endorsing 275 but it goes to show variances that occur from oven to oven.

I noted your web link with the correlation between Alzheimerâs and aluminum and quite frankly, I agree. I did not state that there was a correlation between Alzheimerâs and aluminum, nor do I honestly believe that there is. Aluminum is prevalent in so many areas of our lives and is the most abundant material. It is agreed that there is an elevated amount of aluminum found in autopsy reports of individuals with Alzheimers and this has lead to a very large group of consumers who are genuinely concerned with the use of this metal. For the past 40 years we have had tremendous trouble selling our previous style of natural aluminum pans in many markets (especially France and Italy) and to many commercial bakers because of the leaching and contamination issue. Natural aluminum is unquestionably highly reactive with acidic foods and changes the flavor of many foods as well. Cream that comes in contact with aluminum distorts the taste of it. Acidic foods will literally âeatâ the aluminum. We sent several thousands of natural aluminum 9x13 pans to Knottâs Berry Farm in Southern California many years ago that were used for their boysenberry cakes. After a couple months we were notified that holes were appearing in the pans and large cavities were covering the pan. After sending the pans to a metallurgist we discovered the fruit was literally eating the pans. This same customer has been using our anodized aluminum pans with absolutely no pitting or contamination. The problems with natural aluminum are very real and that is why we elected to anodize our products.

As for the China issue, we are very proud of the quality and manufacturing process of our bakeware. We have very strict controls on our factory, employ our own QC staff, and have on-site our own management team. Our factory is greatly capitalized by our company. Our factory is state of the art in technology and is perhaps the cleanest facility I have ever stepped foot in. Our pans do cost us more as they are made form 100% the same materials we used for Magic Line and then anodized after the fact. If I went to market with a natural aluminum pan I would save the cost of anodizing which adds that additional cost to my product (up to 13% over natural aluminum).

I would like for you to call me to talk some more. I noticed that CC has modified your original post and I have had absolutely nothing to do with that. I posted my response on 3 different boards there only for the reasons to get the free pan offer out to as many people as possible.

Thank you,

Greg
Greg Skipper
Fat Daddios
Toll Free 866.418.9001









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, and I want to add: I did not, have not, nor ever will receive any free, discounted, or otherwise marked-down products or merchandise from FD or ML (nor Wilton for that matter). No free pans for me, thank you. [/b]
I'm happy to clarify any questions about this thread, and appreciate all the honest and freely-given information posted. I'm very sorry the original post was taken down, and am in the process of clarifying with CC why the post was removed.

Thank you to all for your support -- I've have quite a day!

Petit-four Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
Petit-four Posted 27 May 2008 , 10:16pm
post #62 of 90

Hi everyone -- I'm sorry about all the duplicate posts. I've gotten a lot of support and messages -- thank you. I've had to try and keep track of messages written about my "test" in 3 forums.

I'd like to note the following:

1) I don't work for anyone associated in any way with cake supplies, produects, pans, etc.
2) My intent was simply to decide what sort of square pan I'd like to buy. I ran a test (and yes, I actually have a white pastry chef's coat and wear a hairnet!). I have a home-grade GE convection oven.
3) I never received (nor, apparently did any of the 1600+ readers, save one) any information about lower baking temperatures.
4) My test was simply to compare results. Since the original post has been deleted, I can't point out to any of you, but I did to Greg Skipper, that half of the "marks" for FD were higher!
5) Greg acknowledged to me that there is currently no written information about the lower temperatures on the pans nor on the company website. If you recall, I even posted a link to their site.
6) I disagree with CC's decision to take down my post, and strongly encourage them to reconsider their decision.

OK -- I've calmed down now. Again, thanks everyone for the support! You are what make CC great. thumbs_up.gif

YAYI95 Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
YAYI95 Posted 27 May 2008 , 10:20pm
post #63 of 90

Petit-four just wanna thank you for sharing all the information on the pans and the email between you and fd.....

Petit-four Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
Petit-four Posted 27 May 2008 , 10:25pm
post #64 of 90

Thank you -- sorry about the "yelling" in large letters. I am still stunned at what happened, and wanted to clarify my situation. If someone would like a free pan to test, great!

After what happened to me, however, I would rather buy the pans of my choice.

Again, thanks for the support. Normally, I am a rather sedate CC member. Thanks everyone! The support means a lot!

Mike1394 Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
Mike1394 Posted 27 May 2008 , 10:32pm
post #65 of 90

It's BS that your test was taken down. I have some FD pans, and actually like them. Not sure about faster baking times at lower temps. I do know one thing though. It APPEARS influence was put out to pull the original post. Magic Line here I come. I won't buy FD just for this reason alone.

Mike

Petit-four Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
Petit-four Posted 27 May 2008 , 10:39pm
post #66 of 90

Thanks Mike. I'm feeling better!

Yup -- I encouraged everyone in the [deleted] post -- run your own test.

I also want to acknowledge Greg Skipper adds a note in the other Cake Decorating Forum about this. I don't agree with Greg on everything, but he did explain his company, his pans, and such to me.

Sorry about 3 different forum posts running at once -- it wasn't me!

CakeDiva73 Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
CakeDiva73 Posted 27 May 2008 , 11:32pm
post #67 of 90

Just wanted to acknowledge Petit-four and give her a nod. icon_smile.gif During this whole fiasco (and make no mistake my friends, this was a total fiasco) she has been calm, cool & collected. Her communications were professional and succinct in ways I still strive for. She has class and as we all know, ya can't buy class! icon_razz.gif

As for the pans, most of that anodized stuff went right over my head. All I know is she performed a side by side test and the manufacturer who's product did not perform as well came here, had words with someone, the thread was pulled/altered, free pans were offered.....

For me, what I am really surprised about is why more FD pan owners aren't furious about the whole special temperature thing.....how many cakes have been ruined, how much money wasted, how much batter, time and eggs lost?

All because the very backbone of their product, the thing that supposedly makes it work the best and will give you substandard results if used incorrectly is NEVER MENTIONED! I find that really negligent on Fat Daddio's part.

Perhaps instead of worrying about poor test results & losing potential new customers they should worry about a class action disappointment that affects all the customers they already have.

Heath Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
Heath Posted 28 May 2008 , 12:20am
post #68 of 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike1394

It's BS that your test was taken down. I have some FD pans, and actually like them. Not sure about faster baking times at lower temps. I do know one thing though. It APPEARS influence was put out to pull the original post. Magic Line here I come. I won't buy FD just for this reason alone.

Mike




The test was not taken down due to any "influence" by Fat Daddio, and the fact it was taken down should not be reflected on them. If you want to be mad at someone about it, be made at Cake Central.

Just for the record, there is no vendor who has the "influence" to dictate what is posted on CC. Any post that is removed or edited on CC is at the discretion of the moderators and admins of this site.

it is irresponsible to be making posts suggesting things about which you have no knowledge or insight into.

So if you are mad about it.. feel free to rant in a PM to me.. I can't promise I will write back, but at least you can get it off your chest.

janebrophy Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
janebrophy Posted 28 May 2008 , 12:39am
post #69 of 90

Wow, I haven't read this whole post, but I did enjoy the original. I am amazed at this whole thing! I want to say Thank-you to Petit-four for the informative, and enlightening threads!
I definitely won't be ordering a certain brand of pans after this incident!

Heath Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
Heath Posted 28 May 2008 , 12:43am
post #70 of 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by janebrophy

Wow, I haven't read this whole post, but I did enjoy the original. I am amazed at this whole thing! I want to say Thank-you to Petit-four for the informative, and enlightening threads!
I definitely won't be ordering a certain brand of pans after this incident!




well you probably should read the whole thing before making any decisions because this "incident" has nothing to do with Fat Daddio. The drama that has been stirred up is a result of the moderating done by CC, not by any efforts on the part of Fat Daddio to squash the information.

mustang1964 Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
mustang1964 Posted 28 May 2008 , 1:41am
post #71 of 90

Petite four Thank You for the comparison post I thought it was very helpful. Sorry you are getting such a hard time about it. What I don't understand is if they took your post off, how can the post about what the worst thing you wasted your money on for cake supplies ( not the right name) still be on. That post is also very helpful but I would just like to point out Wilton's cake leveler is compared to an other cake leveler.
I definitely will not be buying FD especially for the fact it is made in China. I like to buy made in the U.S.

Petit-four Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
Petit-four Posted 28 May 2008 , 1:49am
post #72 of 90

Mustang and janebrophy -- I just want to say that Heath and I are working this out. I agree with Heath: a very rapid turn of events caused some of the confusion here. I appreciate all the support, and must say Heath and I have been having a respectful conversation.

My post started with the sentence: "Here is my (subjective) opinion." That is all it was meant to be -- something to help CC members make up their own minds. I do appreciate the phone calls from one of the owners of FD to help me find a better baking temperature.

I hope Heath is able to recover the post, or let me post a new test.

Thanks everyone! (and no, still no free pans from ML, Wilton, or anyone!) thumbs_up.gif

marthajo1 Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
marthajo1 Posted 28 May 2008 , 2:15am
post #73 of 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaisieBake

I saw the original post and I thought it was fair (in the sense of balanced, not in the sense of not-so-good).

I'm appalled that the post would be removed and if I had been thinking of buying FD pans, this would convince me not to.





I had to laugh out loud at this cause I was just thinking the same thing! Of course I am the same way when I see a blocked name or website.... I want to know what it says and check it out.

While I can appreciate Greg coming on here to protect his pans image and offering his generous testing offer I would like to be able to make a decision on my own. With all the information.

Edited to add: I finished reading the thread and am pleased to see Heath's response. Unfortunately the actions of the mods do affect how we make decisions. Because of the removed post it reflected negatively in my mind on FD regardless of why it was taken down.

steplite Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
steplite Posted 28 May 2008 , 2:26am
post #74 of 90

Well I just want to know where to buy FD pans and how do I get the free one. I'm sold on the pans now.

Heath Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
Heath Posted 28 May 2008 , 2:27am
post #75 of 90

Petit-four and I have exchanged some PMs regarding this situation.

I believe it has been worked out, and I wanted to make a statement that will hopefully bring an end to the confusion of the day.

1. In hindsight I feel that a mistake was made in removing the post. This was a failure on the part of Jackie and I.

2. The removal of the post was not due to the "influence" of a vendor. Our understanding of the situation was flawed. We understood the situation to be that the comparison test was invalid due to the issue with the cook times.

In discussing this further with both Petit-four and with Greg, it is now clear to me that the test should have been allowed to stand as it was. Our failure to fully understand the issue led to the drama surrounding this issue.

No one should be to blame here other than myself and Jackie. Petit-four did nothing wrong, Fat Daddio did nothing wrong.

As I state earlier, we are in the position of trying to review lots of posts each day, and sometimes we make mistakes, this is one of those times.

I apologize for the confusion and drama this failure has caused.

toristreats Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
toristreats Posted 28 May 2008 , 2:31am
post #76 of 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heath

Petit-four and I have exchanged some PMs regarding this situation.

I believe it has been worked out, and I wanted to make a statement that will hopefully bring an end to the confusion of the day.

1. In hindsight I feel that a mistake was made in removing the post. This was a failure on the part of Jackie and I.

2. The removal of the post was not due to the "influence" of a vendor. Our understanding of the situation was flawed. We understood the situation to be that the comparison test was invalid due to the issue with the cook times.

In discussing this further with both Petit-four and with Greg, it is now clear to me that the test should have been allowed to stand as it was. Our failure to fully understand the issue led to the drama surrounding this issue.

No one should be to blame here other than myself and Jackie. Petit-four did nothing wrong, did nothing wrong.

As I state earlier, we are in the position of trying to review lots of posts each day, and sometimes we make mistakes, this is one of those times.

I apologize for the confusion and drama this failure has caused.




Thanks for clearing that up. Everyone makes mistakes. That's how we learn. I'm glad ya'll could work this out.

Petit-four Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
Petit-four Posted 28 May 2008 , 2:42am
post #77 of 90

Yes, again, thanks Heath.

Sincerely,
Petit-four

ATCakes Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
ATCakes Posted 28 May 2008 , 2:52am
post #78 of 90

To all involved:

Thanks for not taking this to a low level of he did she did. I think all of you have handled this professionaly and in a very mature way. It takes a big person to admit when they make a mistake and Heath you are BIG!!!
I applaud you for that. Petit four you have been very gracious throughout this whole thing. Greg I applaud you for representing your products and company in a professional manner. A lot of companies wouldn't handle it this way. This should be an example to them all.

nickymom Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
nickymom Posted 28 May 2008 , 3:13am
post #79 of 90

Thanks to Greg for the reply & for explaining the temp adjustments. It's good to know that that will now be added to the pans instructions.

Mike1394 Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
Mike1394 Posted 28 May 2008 , 9:23am
post #80 of 90

Thanks for the explaination Heath.

Mike

lchristi27 Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
lchristi27 Posted 28 May 2008 , 10:26am
post #81 of 90

Thanks for the insight on all ends!

leah_s Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
leah_s Posted 28 May 2008 , 11:24am
post #82 of 90

Geez, I stay in the kitchen to bake for a few hours and all heck breaks loose!

Anyway, I was not the 1 out of 1600 who knew about the different temps needed for the Fat Daddio pans. That was discovered by another CC member, and I reacted to it. However, that is my main objection to the FD pans. I have an assortment of pans and I load up my oven when I'm baking. Having one or two/a few pans that require special handling is more than useless to me. I can't stop to fire up another oven to bake in a pan that needs it's own lower temp. I consider that a major design flaw.

The rounded corners of the square pans are also questionable. Yes, the edges of the corner are sharp, but the corners are definitely rounded.

I thought that petit-four did a fair test and does not deserve any flack she has received over this.

And I will stand by my previous statement. I will not purchase FD pans because of the special handling requirements. Magic Line performs wonderfully, every time.

peacockplace Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
peacockplace Posted 28 May 2008 , 12:54pm
post #83 of 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by leahs

Geez, I stay in the kitchen to bake for a few hours and all heck breaks loose!

Anyway, I was not the 1 out of 1600 who knew about the different temps needed for the pans. That was discovered by another CC member, and I reacted to it. However, that is my main objection to the FD pans. I have an assortment of pans and I load up my oven when I'm baking. Having one or two/a few pans that require special handling is more than useless to me. I can't stop to fire up another oven to bake in a pan that needs it's own lower temp. I consider that a major design flaw.

The rounded corners of the square pans are also questionable. Yes, the edges of the corner are sharp, but the corners are definitely rounded.

I thought that petit-four did a fair test and does not deserve any flack she has received over this.

And I will stand by my previous statement. I will not purchase FD pans because of the special handling requirements. Magic Line performs wonderfully, every time.




I totally agree!!!! I need to be able to bake with lots of pan at one time. I don't want to bake another round of cakes for my FD pans. It ticks me off that it was not mentioned any where when I bought my pans!!! icon_mad.gif I wouldn't have ordered them if I knew I couldn't cook with them right along my other pans. Who has the money to buy all the pans over so that they can be the same brand? thumbsdown.gif

janebrophy Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
janebrophy Posted 28 May 2008 , 12:59pm
post #84 of 90

leahs, and peacockplace, you guys have nailed it! I agree with you 100%! I have had the misfortune of investing in pans (Neither one of the brands mentioned) only to find out , after complaining about them, that they required special attention, rendering my investment completely useless. I love it that posts like this can keep others from making that same mistake!

Petit-four Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
Petit-four Posted 28 May 2008 , 1:08pm
post #85 of 90

Hi everyone! I'm currently baking up a white cake (scratch, butter-based) at 300. I calibrated the oven -- it bakes 300.

And, I'll also give it a shot at 275. I'll try a box mix too.

OK -- I'll post the results. I think I'll start a new thread, though. OK? thumbs_up.gif

thecakemaker Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
thecakemaker Posted 28 May 2008 , 1:15pm
post #86 of 90

Thanks Greg! I recently purchased an 11" x 15" x 3" FD pan from GSA for my son's birthday cake and an upcoming graduation cake. I used it for the first time this past weekend. I did notice that for the very first time the cake was actually done when I went to check on it the first time - which is a first for me. My cakes usually take 15 to 20 minutes longer to bake partially due to the fact that I bake at a lower temperature and tend to add a bit of extra batter. I was pleasantly surprised and loved the pan. Keep up the good work!

Thanks
Debbie

leah_s Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
leah_s Posted 28 May 2008 , 1:33pm
post #87 of 90

Petit-four,
What start a new thread? I was hoping that we could get this one to maybe 17-18 pages.

No, just kidding.

GregSkipper Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
GregSkipper Posted 28 May 2008 , 8:04pm
post #88 of 90

Hello Leah,

Thanks for your posting. I know you are not a fan of my pans and I do understand your reasoning. Our pans are more efficient in baking and for those who don't have the resources to replace their pans or who bake in mixed batches like you do, I completely understand your hesitation.

I feel we make a great pan that is obviously not for everyone. Alot of people love our products and some don't. I know that everyone is not going to be on board with us. I do believe that our anodizing brings tremendous benefits. However, if a baker can save several minutes off their bake time AND bake at a lower temperature, that translates into substantial dollars in your pocket and creates greater profitability for each person.

Leah, I totally respect your opinion and appreciate your support of CC and the members here. I do secretly hold out that in the future maybe I can convert you to Fat Daddios.....hmmm, are you coming to ICES this year?

Thanks,

Greg

GregSkipper Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
GregSkipper Posted 28 May 2008 , 8:06pm
post #89 of 90

Hello Leah,

Thanks for your posting. I know you are not a fan of my pans and I do understand your reasoning. Our pans are more efficient in baking and for those who don't have the resources to replace their pans or who bake in mixed batches like you do, I completely understand your hesitation.

I feel we make a great pan that is obviously not for everyone. Alot of people love our products and some don't. I know that everyone is not going to be on board with us. I do believe that our anodizing brings tremendous benefits. However, if a baker can save several minutes off their bake time AND bake at a lower temperature, that translates into substantial dollars in your pocket and creates greater profitability for each person.

Leah, I totally respect your opinion and appreciate your support of CC and the members here. I do secretly hold out that in the future maybe I can convert you to Fat Daddios.....hmmm, are you coming to ICES this year?

Thanks,

Greg

leah_s Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
leah_s Posted 29 May 2008 , 4:32am
post #90 of 90

No, I'm not an ICES member.

Quote by @%username% on %date%

%body%