14", 12", 10"- Look Too Weird Stacked?

Decorating By BCo Updated 2 Mar 2007 , 5:29pm by BCo

BCo Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
BCo Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:01pm
post #1 of 23

I have to make a cake to serve 100 people (well it's 150 ppl but the cakes for around 100) anywho, I was thinking 14", 12", 10" stacked but will it look weird like the top is missing - that just seems like a large area on a 10" cake at the top. Any suggestions? I have 3 cake cutting guides and of course they all say 3 different things and I usually like to make sure there is plenty - maybe a little over the # needed - Just to be on the safe sideicon_smile.gif It's a 16th bday party for 150ppl - but the majority she said would be adults - consuming alcohol -(nice for at 16th bday!icon_smile.gif so I told her lets do it for 100 b/c I'm sure a lot of them won't eat too much cake.

I just don't want it to look like the top is unfinished or I forgot a layer!

thanks guys

Oh- and if anyone has any pics of these sizes together that would be great!

Brandie

22 replies
springlakecake Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
springlakecake Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:08pm
post #2 of 23

yeah, I am not sure. Maybe you can surf around and see if you see another cake done with those sizes and see if it looks good or not. My gut reaction would be to say it might look a little weird. Maybe a 16-12-8?

bobwonderbuns Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
bobwonderbuns Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:13pm
post #3 of 23

Take your cake pans and stack them on top of each other, this will give you a general idea of how your cake will look. If you think it needs something else, you'll be able to figure it out from there.

justsweet Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
justsweet Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:14pm
post #4 of 23

I see no problem what is going on top of the of cake. Flowers, the number 16 with flowers, her monogram, etc. Depending on you design on top, if adds to the cake and it looks great go for it.

Ksue Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
Ksue Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:14pm
post #5 of 23

What about a 12-9-6?

BCo Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
BCo Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:15pm
post #6 of 23

Well I thought about that too - going up on the bottom size and doing 4" incraments (sp?) - so that would leave me 2 inches around each layer right? Would the top 8" layer look way out of proportion with the large 16" layer - Dang - it's so hard to visualize and I need to go by the bigger pans since I don't own anything larger then a 12"

minnow Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
minnow Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:16pm
post #7 of 23

I personnally think tiered cakes for other than weddings are odd. Call me old-fashioned.

You might try getting on Duff's website. He did a "Sweet 16" or something like it on his show not too long ago. See if you can tell the sizes on it. Maybe that will help. Good luck!

christabelle682 Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
christabelle682 Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:17pm
post #8 of 23

Is there going to be a topper? If so, you might consider how big it is and it it'll look off with a large cake base... then you'll know if you can go with your numbers or if you need to rearrange. Other options could be smaller size cakes to make the tiers and then a 1/2 or 1/4 sheet on the side for extra cake...

cindycakes2 Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
cindycakes2 Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:18pm
post #9 of 23

I like the 8" or smaller cakes on the tops of tiered cakes. How about 16,12,8?

scoobam Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
scoobam Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:21pm
post #10 of 23

Will you have a bottom border on the cakes?
it might be too much of a cone effect with there only being 2in separated and then with the border taking up space that cuts into the 2in making it less... did that just make sense?? LOL

I personally wouldn't do stacked with less than 3 in difference....unless there's a design reason for it, KWIM?

14, 11, 8
14, 10, 6??

I think those 3 sizes (14, 12, 10) get you way more than 100 servings... so may not been even needed.

justsweet Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
justsweet Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:22pm
post #11 of 23

here are some cakes so can see what the sizes look like

http://www.flickr.com/photos/weddingcakes/page21/

BCo Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
BCo Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:27pm
post #12 of 23

yea- for some reason I always think anything bigger then an 8" on top just looks like it's missing something. I'm not sure yet what the topper is going to be maybe a fondant 16 and something to do with Tinkerbell - since that's her theme. what I think I might end up doing is just adding the 8 inch on top just for looks sake!! lol - Then she can just take that cake home with her and cut up the rest of the cake for the guests. Ahhh - I'm such a visual person it's hard for me to see what somethings going to look like in my mind!!

thanks so much guys for the suggestions!

BCo Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
BCo Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:29pm
post #13 of 23

thanks justsweet - that's perfect -

springlakecake Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
springlakecake Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:31pm
post #14 of 23

okay here is what I would do. I didnt read your post well enough for number of servings. I would do a 14-10-6. According to Earlenes chart that would be enough for 105. (I dont think that is huge servings, but decent size)

BCo Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
BCo Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:32pm
post #15 of 23

And yes - there will be fondant ribbon roses around each border with ribbon too - so you might be right that I need the extra space around each tier. If I did 14", 10", 6" would that be enough for 100?

BCo Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
BCo Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:34pm
post #16 of 23

sorry Merissa - I posted before I read your post!! Lol

ok - then it's settled- I think I will go with the 14, 10, 6! Hope it's enough!


thanks again for everyone's help!

Wiltonlady Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
Wiltonlady Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:41pm
post #17 of 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bturpin

And yes - there will be fondant ribbon roses around each border with ribbon too - so you might be right that I need the extra space around each tier. If I did 14", 10", 6" would that be enough for 100?


a 14 inch serves about 63 people, 10" serves about 28 and a 6" serves 12. I think that would work for you.

dodibug Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
dodibug Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:45pm
post #18 of 23

You should have enough with 6/10/14 combo.

Just a suggestion about serving sizes-figure out what chart works for you and your cakes. For me, the Wilton chart works well (because of the height of my cakes) but for others they don't feel like the servings are adequate. It really depends on your cakes and what will work for you!

BCo Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
BCo Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 6:53pm
post #19 of 23

My cakes are about 4 inches tall. I use 2 inch pans and then there is a layer of filling/icing inbetween the layers. So 2 inch layer/filling/2 inch layer. I just hate not having enough - but then I hate to waste so much too!! LOL - this is my first "BIG" cake so I have no clue how to judge - I guess this will be a learning experience for me all the way around!

dodibug Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
dodibug Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 7:03pm
post #20 of 23

Make sure if it's a family member/friend that is cutting the cake that they have the cutting chart so they understand the sizes and amount of servings the cake should yield.

BCo Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
BCo Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 7:06pm
post #21 of 23

yea- I might be attending the party so I can do the cutting and make sure it's what it's supposed to be!

Confectionary1 Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
Confectionary1 Posted 1 Mar 2007 , 9:31pm
post #22 of 23

What about doing the bottom a "dummy" cake?

Just an idea???

BCo Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
BCo Posted 2 Mar 2007 , 5:29pm
post #23 of 23

That might work but I rather not go through the expense of buying one at this time. Although in the long run it might be nice to have.

Good thought

Quote by @%username% on %date%

%body%