Wedding Cake Pan Size

Decorating By ashleyj Updated 20 Jun 2013 , 5:55am by CWR41

ashleyj Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
ashleyj Posted 17 Oct 2010 , 2:39am
post #1 of 15

For a 3-tiered wedding cake are you supposed to use pan sizes that are 2 or 4 inches apart between the tiers? For example, I was going to do a 12x2, 10x2, and 8x2 but most of my books have 14x2, 10x2, 6x2. Is 2 inches enough room between each tier? A 6 inch cake for the top tier seems too small. Just wondering what most of you do for wedding cakes.
Thank You!

14 replies
leily Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
leily Posted 17 Oct 2010 , 2:46am
post #2 of 15

it all depends on the look you're going for, any additional decorations you need to place around each cake, and how many servings you need.

There is no right or wrong way. Although people do have preferences. Some prefer a 2" difference and others prefer a 3"or4" difference for looks. But in the end it really comes down to servings and design.

raquel1 Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
raquel1 Posted 17 Oct 2010 , 2:53am
post #3 of 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashleyj

For a 3-tiered wedding cake are you supposed to use pan sizes that are 2 or 4 inches apart between the tiers? For example, I was going to do a 12x2, 10x2, and 8x2 but most of my books have 14x2, 10x2, 6x2. Is 2 inches enough room between each tier? A 6 inch cake for the top tier seems too small. Just wondering what most of you do for wedding cakes.
Thank You!




When you have a 4" difference the scale just looks better. The last time a bride insisted on 14, 12, 10, 8, the top tier just looked too big. Just doing the top in a 6" would have looked soo much better imho, but she loved it icon_biggrin.gif

audrey0522 Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
audrey0522 Posted 17 Oct 2010 , 2:54am
post #4 of 15

I would look at some of the pictures on CC and see what look you prefer. A 2 inch difference only gives 1 inch around each tier to decorate vs. 2 inches. For some cakes it looks fine. To me it looks more like a tower. For me personally I prefer the look of a 4 inch difference. 6 inch actually looks fine as the top tier of a wedding cake in my opinion anyway.

leah_s Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
leah_s Posted 17 Oct 2010 , 4:10am
post #5 of 15

A 6" top tier is the industry standard. It's what commercial toppers are sized for and what a florist will expect if making a floral topper. My fav is to use 3" differences. 6/9/12 looks nice!

ashleyj Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
ashleyj Posted 17 Oct 2010 , 4:27am
post #6 of 15

These comments and suggestions are great. Thanks guys!

linnod Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
linnod Posted 17 Jun 2013 , 2:29pm
post #7 of 15

If you are doing a 6,9,12 what would you do for the bottom if you were doing 4 tier. What do you think are the sizes of this cake? 

http://pinterest.com/pin/152066924891062956/

leah_s Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
leah_s Posted 17 Jun 2013 , 2:52pm
post #8 of 15

I do a 15".  I've done a bunch of them.  Serves 185  Great size for many weddings.

auntginn Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
auntginn Posted 17 Jun 2013 , 5:43pm
post #9 of 15

IMH the 3-4 inch difference looks better, the 2 inch between tiers give a tower effect, but some designs such as the floating rose work better with less separation.

kakeladi Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
kakeladi Posted 17 Jun 2013 , 6:44pm
post #10 of 15

It really is a personal thing as to which looks better.  I definately go for the 4" difference - 14, 10, 6 etc.

matthewkyrankelly Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
matthewkyrankelly Posted 17 Jun 2013 , 6:58pm
post #11 of 15

You can always stack your pans upside down to get an impression of the scale.

linnod Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
linnod Posted 20 Jun 2013 , 2:48am
post #12 of 15

6,9,12,15 serves 185 people?

CWR41 Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
leah_s Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
leah_s Posted 20 Jun 2013 , 3:53am
post #14 of 15

185, 188, close enough.

CWR41 Cake Central Cake Decorator Profile
CWR41 Posted 20 Jun 2013 , 5:55am
post #15 of 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by leah_s 

185, 188, close enough.


Yes, it is.  I responded because the question sounded to me like it was unbelievable.

Quote by @%username% on %date%

%body%