The Great Scratch-Off...Yellow Cakes

Decorating By Lita829 Updated 28 Apr 2014 , 9:29pm by MBalaska

Luvsthedogs Posted 4 Jun 2009 , 2:34pm
post #91 of 424

K8Memphis,

I know exactly what you mean about Rose's recipes. Tried my best to be exact on one of her yellow cakes and it still came out dry. Beautiful cake, tasted great, rose nicely, but was dry. I even posted on her forum about the results and got several suggestions about better outcome. I don't want a recipe that finicky! I only bake for fun, not for sale, but when I spend the time and $$ to do so want a reliable recipe. Have tried Sylvia's yellow cake and was very pleased.

May try some of these to compare, but don't need all that temptation sitting around! Looking forward to seeing the results from everyone.

Cindy

-K8memphis Posted 4 Jun 2009 , 3:14pm
post #92 of 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by CindyD333

K8Memphis,

I know exactly what you mean about Rose's recipes. Tried my best to be exact on one of her yellow cakes and it still came out dry. Beautiful cake, tasted great, rose nicely, but was dry. I even posted on her forum about the results and got several suggestions about better outcome. I don't want a recipe that finicky! I only bake for fun, not for sale, but when I spend the time and $$ to do so want a reliable recipe. Have tried Sylvia's yellow cake and was very pleased.

May try some of these to compare, but don't need all that temptation sitting around! Looking forward to seeing the results from everyone.

Cindy




Love Sylvia's!!! I mean it comes out like a wonderful scratch/mix combo--fluffy enough but with enough denseness to be pleasant, holds well at room temperature, does not dry out.

I am allergic to whipping egg yolks & whites separate for cakes so I toss mine in -- no worries but I did typo the flour once & started using 2.5 cups and that works too.

Now to me, that's a workhorse formula--no teeter totter--no Foghorn Leghorn /Chicken Hawk vigilance at the oven door--you can twist, tweak and screw it up and it still comes out. Even for moi.

Go Sylvia So Sylvia

Lita829 Posted 4 Jun 2009 , 3:36pm
post #93 of 424

Hey ladies...

Here are my findings on the cakes I sampled:

I halved all four of the recipes.
CeShell's Not-So-Lemon Lemon Cake from Magnolia Bakery
Flavor: Mild lemon flavor...very good as an all purpose flavor. I paired it with Peach Preserves and Vanilla Buttercream.
Texture: I baked it in layers in a 6" heart pan. It came out yet light and fluffy. I really liked how high it baked up.
Moistness: Moist but not wet.
Cost: Very resonable
Ease: Easy to follow directions
Cupcake Potential: Yes..I do think it could be converted into cuppies.

Overall, a very good cake. I'm adding it to my recipe box! I give it a 9.

Here is a photo:


All-Purpose Buttery Yellow Cake
Flavor: Good..very vanilla. I paired it with pineapple preserves and vanilla buttercream.
Texture: I baked it in layers in a 6" square. It was pretty dense. I would have liked it if it was a little lighter.
Moistness: Very moist...on the verge of being too moist (if possible).
Ease: Pretty easy, although i was little thrown off by the texture of the batter.
Cost: Reasonable
Cupcake potential: I don't think this would be a good recipe to convert to cuppies.

Overall I give it a 6.

Here is a photo:


Sylvia Weinstock's Classic Yellow Cake
Flavor: Very tasty! I can taste the sour cream. I paired it with vanilla buttercream.
Texture: Light and fluffy. I baked it in a 9 1/2 X 4" loaf pan.
Moistness: Moist but not wet.
Cost: Reasonable
Ease: Moderate being as though you have to make meringue and fold it in.
Cupcake Potential: Yes.

Overall a very good cake. I'm adding this one to my recipe box. I give in a 9.

Here is a photo:

CakeMan Raven's Modified Red-Velvet Cake
Flavor: Good. It DOES taste like Duncan Heins! I paired it with strawberry jam and vanilla buttercream.
Texture: Smooth with a fine crumb.
Moistness: Moist but not wet.
Ease: Pretty straight foward. I think it was an easy recipe.
Cost: Reasonable.
Cupcake Potential: Yes

Overall a good cake....I give it an 8. I think I'm keeping it.

Here is a photo:
LL
LL
LL
LL

EatSomeCake Posted 4 Jun 2009 , 5:58pm
post #94 of 424

Lita-

Thanks for writing down all the details and sharing pictures with us. I'll have to try some of those recipes.

Lita829 Posted 4 Jun 2009 , 6:41pm
post #95 of 424

No problem icon_smile.gif

KitchenKat Posted 5 Jun 2009 , 12:27am
post #96 of 424

OMG! I spent most of today baking and in the evening my toughest customers (DH and our boys) assessed the cakes. I'll post results later. For now lemme just show you what went down. icon_wink.gifLL
LL

Lita829 Posted 5 Jun 2009 , 1:51am
post #97 of 424

LOL...CasualKitchen, that was cute icon_lol.gif

sayhellojana Posted 5 Jun 2009 , 5:49am
post #98 of 424

I love how you did them all at the same time! I should have done that... maybe I'll do two and have a little taste test, too.
No, I did not weigh. I don't have a kitchen scale. I did measure correctly, though, by spooning the flour into the cup. I used real cake flour, not the AP + cornstarch version, and I sifted twice. The cake rose so well and seemed to be fluffy, I just wish it was more moist. Is there anything else that could have gone wrong?

sayhellojana Posted 5 Jun 2009 , 9:10am
post #99 of 424

I stumbled upon this blog post with a tutorial on cake layers using a modified version of the All-Occasion Downy Yellow cake - http://joepastry.web.aplus.net/index.php?cat=115

The cake in the photos doesnt look dry at all, and Casual Kitchen has had awesome success with this recipe. I must have done something wrong. I might try again, if time allows.

KitchenKat Posted 6 Jun 2009 , 1:11am
post #100 of 424
Quote:
Quote:

Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:10 pm Post subject:
I stumbled upon this blog post with a tutorial on cake layers using a modified version of the All-Occasion Downy Yellow cake - http://joepastry.web.aplus.net/index.php?cat=115

The cake in the photos doesnt look dry at all, and Casual Kitchen has had awesome success with this recipe. I must have done something wrong. I might try again, if time allows.




That's exactly how the cake looks like! I didn't bake one when I tried out the other cakes on the scratch off because I bake it so often my testers and I know exactly what it's like and compared the other cakes to what we're used to. I'll try to bake one later so I can post pictures of the crumb and to get better comparisons against the other cakes.

I'm surprised the modified version uses more flour. Flour is a binder so I would think adding more flour makes for a drier, sturdier cake.

Some very important things about making this cake:
1. All ingredients must be at room temp. I usually take them out of the fridge at least an hour before baking (30 mins for the butter but we live in the tropics so it melts easily here)
2. weigh all ingredients, except for salt and vanilla
3. sift flour before weighing. I do sift directly on the scale.
4. do not overbake. (finger leaves depression on top, tester comes out moist and sides haven't pulled away from pan.
5. correct oven temp
6. Serve at room temp.

It's deceptively simple but as K8memphis says, it's quite fiddly in that you have to follow everything precisely. But after you've done it a few times, and you've gotten to know your oven and your ingredients, it becomes second nature so much so you can almost make it with your eyes closed!

I think the the crumb on this cake and mouthfeel may not appeal to some people because it's very fine and velvety, not like other cakes which are soft and fluffy. It melts in your mouth and opposed to feeling pillowy but it is moist, soft and tender. It holds together well, not crumbly at all. If you want a coarser crumb, try mixing it using the creaming method. The crumb won't be as fine but will be more like the other cakes.

The flavor is phenomenal BUT, since there's a high proportion of salt, it can be a bit "salty" especially for those who are used to very sweet cakes or box mixes. It's sturdy enough to carve but still feels light. I like how it improves with standing because I normally complete my cakes over 2 or 3 days and this cakes keeps on getting moister, drawing moisture from the filling and frosting.

Not out to convince anyone to love this cake. Just saying why I like it so much - easy, delicious and versatile.

Lita829 Posted 6 Jun 2009 , 1:44am
post #101 of 424

Thanks for the info, CasualKitchen...I think I'm gonna try that recipe. It sounds good!!

KitchenKat Posted 6 Jun 2009 , 1:51am
post #102 of 424

Here are my results. I signed up to try America's Test Kitchen Cake but when I reviewed the list of recipes I found others more intriguing.

I baked half recipes of the cakes I tested in either two 6" or 7" layers. My testers (my family and some friends) tasted the cakes on day 2 and 3, with and without frosting. Cakes were stored at room temp under a cake dome, which is how I normally store my cakes. Since I did not try to make cupcakes I won't comment on their ability to be converted to cupcakes.

Results, Part I

1. Serious Cake

Texture: Fine, moist crumbs but edges were crunchy. Crumbly slices.
Moistness: My husband said it was dry. Not as moist as we wouldve liked. (ETA after 3 days of being filled and frosted, the cake was moister was more flavorful, from absorbing the frosting.)
Flavor: Good balance of sweetness. No floury aftertaste. Vanilla flavor was not pronounced. Flavor is not rich like butter-based cakes. I found the flavor one dimensional.
Ease of preparation: Average. Creaming method.
Cost: Average. Does not require special ingredients
Other comments: Cake was pale. I prefer not to use shortening in my baked goods but I tried this cake to see if I was missing out. It was a fun learning experience but I am not likely to use this recipe again. 6 out of 10
ETA: the crunchy edges are not a problem because they will soften after you apply frosting or you can just trim the off. It doesn't affect the rest of the cake.

2. Great American Cakes


Texture: Fine, moist, light, fluffy but large (coarse) crumb. Tender cake. This recipe is said to be like a box mix. I would say that claim is true but this is way better.

Moistness: Very moist especially on the day it was baked. Dried out somewhat after 2 days at room temp. Slices of filled and frosted cake were crumbly. 

Flavor: Good flavor. Good balance of sweetness, butter and vanilla. Delicious freshly baked however after a couple of days it was noticeably drier and with less flavor. Somewhat disappointing in that sense. 

Ease of preparation: Average. Creaming method

Cost: This recipe would probably benefit from premium ingredients like fine Madagascar vanilla extract and European butter. It can be economical or costly depending on quality of ingredients used 
Other comments: Very pleased with this cake on the first day but my enthusiasm faded after a couple of days. It baked evenly although the edges did get a bit crunchy. I baked it in a 6 pan. Good but not exceptional. 7 out of 10


3. Cakeman Raven

Texture: Smooth and dense. Crumbs are coarse but tender
Moistness: Very moist almost to the point of being oily. Remains moist even after 2 days at room temp
Flavor: DH commented it tastes like cupcakes. A tad bit sweet. Predominant flavor is the tanginess of the buttermilk but well balanced by the vanilla. Its a yummy cake
Ease of preparation: Very easy. One bowl method. Can mix by hand.
Cost: Average. Does not require special ingredients
Other comments: This feels the most moist and tender because it uses oil. However flavor suffers somewhat. Eaten on its own there is a slight oily aftertaste. The buttermilk and vinegar balance the oil but doesnt completely mask the taste. Predominant flavor is buttermilk. This recipe seems to use far less vanilla than the other cakes which is surprising as the other ingredients are not very flavorful. After 3 days I filled and frosted this cake and the slices came out beautifully moist, tender and cohesive. Paired wonderfully with frosting, aftertaste was imperceptible with frosting. This would be great for fillings and frosting that have to be refrigerated because since it's oil based, the layers will remain tender even when cold. Got rave reviews from friends who tried it. Definitely a keeper. 9 out of 10
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL

sayhellojana Posted 6 Jun 2009 , 2:19am
post #103 of 424

Casual Kitchen -
Thanks for the help troubleshooting. I am going to try again with eggs at room temp and sifting before I measure. I am convinced that I didn't overbake since the cake was very moist, did not spring from the sides or the pan, and left a finger indent when I pulled it, but I will watch it like a hawk nonetheless. I checked the recipe again, and I did follow it correctly. I'm thinking that my cold eggs must have been the problem. I normally bring butter and milk to room temp but always forget about the eggs, and with Serious_Cake's recipe it doesn't make a difference, which is what I'm used to.
I am sorry your SeriousCake turned out moist and crunchy on the outsides. I've never had that problem. Yes, the cake is very pale. I actually call it "vanilla cake" and not yellow cake, and I use more vanilla than called for, as well as a hint of lemon and almond.
The cakeman raven looks and is described just like when I make it as red velvet, and I am deffinantly going to try this version as a yellow cake. The texture as red velvet is so wonderful and moist, and I happen to love the buttermilk flavor in cakes. I'm looking forward to it icon_smile.gif

kkitchen Posted 6 Jun 2009 , 2:04pm
post #104 of 424

I really need to thank the person that started this thread. See, for me I tend to look at the science behind things. We are all cooking the same in some cases - recipes and all yielding totally differnt results- now, this is fascinating.
Normally when I try recipes, I tend to get for the most part great results. What I am realizing is that we all cook at different oven temperatures, different climates - home, humidity level.
It really amazes... and now I know why so many people tend to tweak recipes. That explains to me why so many people rave about certain recipes and some people can't get it to work.

Does that make any sense?

hollylikescake Posted 6 Jun 2009 , 2:11pm
post #105 of 424

just saving the thread. I am going to try some of these for sure!

Lita829 Posted 6 Jun 2009 , 6:15pm
post #106 of 424

Absolutely, TrinaR...I get what you are saying. I am also watching a thread abou the pros and cons of sharing recipes and in it I told them that I really don't mind sharing recipes because the recipe is only half of the results. EACH baker bakes differently and has different "Baking Hands". Not to say that they are wrong in their preparation because there is more than one way to skin a cat icon_wink.gif
It is pretty amazing icon_smile.gif

KitchenKat Posted 7 Jun 2009 , 1:27am
post #107 of 424

Here's Part II of my cake test results. As with the others I didn't comment on their ability to be converted into cupcakes because I didn't try making cupcakes, except with the Downy Yellow Cake from the Cake Bible. I baked half recipes in either 6" or 7" pans. Each half recipe yielded two layers.

Toba Garret's
Ultimate Yellow Cake

Texture: Spongy, fine crumb. Tender cake. The edges got crisp during baking but this isn't a problem
Moistness: This is even moister than Great American Cake. Very moist but not wet or oily.

Flavor: Delicious butter-vanilla aroma matched by delicious butter-vanilla flavor. It is similar to Sylvia Weinstocks cake. Very good. When paired with frosting the cake holds its own. It can take on a supporting role to stronger flavors e.g. chocolate or lemon curd or it can be the star of milder 
frostings
Ease of preparation: Standard. Creaming method

Cost: Even with supermarket brands and vanilla flavoring this cake is delicious. Using premium ingredients would only make it more sublime.
Other comments: Slices tend to be crumbly. Baked evenly with crunchy edges. 8 out of 10 only because I like the taste of Sylvia's and Downy Yellow better. Even my testers concluded the same.

Sylvia Weinstock's Classic Yellow Cake

Texture: Light, spongy, fine crumb. Very tender cake.

Moistness: This is was the 2nd moistest cake (after Cake Man Raven). Moist almost to the point of being greasy/buttery but in a very good way.
Flavor: Everyone unanimously agreed it was one of the most delicious cake of the 7 we tried. Very good. I ran out of unsalted butter so I used salted butter. I forgot to adjust the salt and added the original amount called for in the original recipe. Turned out to be a lucky mistake because the cake came out so well rounded and balanced in flavor. The butter, and vanilla flavors are heightened. The sour cream contributes not only a tangy, full flavor but also adds to the moistness and tenderness of this cake. This cake pairs best with a not too sweet frosting as the cake itself is already on the sweet side. The sugar in this cake is almost twice the weight of the flour! In her books Sylvia uses an all butter mousseline which isnt so sweet and this cake would pair perfectly with that. I wouldnt use powdered sugar based frosting on this cake. 
A dark chocolate ganache is sublime too!
Ease of preparation: Fiddliest. Standard creaming method to incorporate ingredients then whip egg whites separately and fold into batter. The increase in lightness and volume due to this step may be minimal but to me its worth the extra step. I may even have overbaked this cake as I forgot all about it and remembered it just in time. I took it out of the oven after the sides started pulling from the pan but it still came out moist and tender and the flavor was still great. 

Cost: From pocket friendly to expensive, depending on the quality of ingredients you use. I tried it using supermarket brands and it came out superb. Next time Im going to use European butter and Madagascar vanilla. 

Other comments: Maintains moistness even after a few days at room temp. Need slices. Layers baked evenly but browned easily (due to extra sugar). Delicious, delicious, delicious! Love it . 9 out of 10
  

Sky High

Vanilla Buttermilk

Texture: Coarse crumb. Firm, not spongy. Sticky. Dense.

Moistness: The driest of the lot. 

Flavor: Smells deliciously buttery but actually tastes very eggy. Lacks sweetness. One dimensional flavor. Vanilla is practically overpowered by the eggs. Even when paired a sweet frosting (Kahlua mousseline), the cake remained bland.

Ease of preparation: Very easy. Hi-ratio (two step) method

Cost: I feel this cake needs premium ingredients to shine. Use the best european butter and finest vanilla extract. In this sense, the cake can be quite expensive to prepare. Using supermarket brands is less costly but will not produce good flavors.

Other comments: The top domed during baking and then sank slightly upon cooling. I know I underbaked it slightly but I wanted to keep as much moisture as possible. Even then it was dry and unappealing. Moistness improves after letting the frosted and filled cake stand for at least at room temp but flavor did not improve. I really wanted to like this cake because most of the recipes from that book are very good but I'm very disappointed with this cake. I followed the instructions to the letter. Will not make again, unless I'm inspired to find out if I did something wrong the first time. 5 out of 10

All Occasion Downy Yellow Buter Cake


note: I didn't bake this together with the other 6 cakes. I made it yesterday and had people try it yesterday evening. I also passed out samples of the other cakes so they could make comparisons.
Texture: Fine, velvety crumb. Feels denser than Sylvias, Tobas and Great American Cake because cake is velvety soft, not pillowy soft. The texture is similar to Sky High but not as compact and is way lighter. This cake has the highest proportion of baking powder making it really light.
Moistness: Moist but not in the way CakeMan Ravens or Sylvia Weinstocks is moist. Those cakes are moist to the point of almost being wet or oily and the crumbs compact in your mouth. This is moist as in buttery crumbs melt in your mouth. 

Flavor: Delicious. Voted one of the most delicious cakes, together with Sylvia's. Good balance of ingredients. Very good flavor which improves over time. Like Sylvias this calls for frosting thats not too sweet so I wouldnt pair it with powder sugar based buttercream. Mousseline, IMBC or classic French BC are perfect, as well as ganache. It amazes me how it can have such great flavor given that amongst the 7 cakes I tested it has one of the lowest proportions of butter, and has far less sugar than the other cakes which were highly rated for their flavor. I like the roundess of flavor contributed by the salt.
Ease of preparation: Mixing is Easy. Hi ratio method. BUT measuring and baking is a whole new ball game. Very important to measure by weight for precision. Very important to have ingredients at room temp. Very important to have correct oven temp.To maintain moistness its imperative not to overbake. Test for doneness at least 7 minutes before minimum baking time. Top should still hold depression if pressed with a finger, toothpick inserted in the center should come out moist but not wet with batter, sides should not have pulled from pan. If you follow the directions and these tips exactly a perfect cake is almost guaranteed. I do concede that you may need some experience with it for consistent results. In this sense it can be off putting especially if your first attempt was a dud. 

Cost: Reasonable but premium ingredients make a world of difference to this cake.

Ability to turn into cupcakes: Temperemental. I used to have great success with it when I was using a better milled cake flour and a convection oven. Since moving to another tropical country, using local flour and a gas oven, my cupcakes have been failing. They rise but fall on cooling. Bottoms were hollow. I've been experimenting to get it right but haven't had luck yet. Reducing baking powder or reducing sugar gives the cupcakes good form but affects taste and texture. I've since decided to use either WASC or Martha Stewart's cupcake recipe until I can solve the Downy Yellow Cupcake conundrum
Other comments: Bakes evenly. Carves well when chilled but is not heavy or dense. The cake improves in texture and flavor even after holding at room temp for a few days. Though the original recipe calls for 9 pans, the layers will only be 1 1/4 tall and the finished cake will be short. I either use the wedding cake conversion chart on the Cake Bible to make layers tall enough to torte or I bake the original quantity in 8 pans. 9 out of 10

As I am truly obsessive, I made comparison charts for these cakes plus for a few more cakes on the scratch off list. The charts scale down the recipes and also show the ingredient proportions in baker's percentages. By looking at the chart you can predict how each recipe is going to behave/taste/feel. Interesting stuff for cake nerds like me. PM me your email address if you want a copy.
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL

AKA_cupcakeshoppe Posted 7 Jun 2009 , 3:44am
post #108 of 424

TheCasualKitchen, i would love to get a copy of that comparison chart. summer_wine23@yahoo.com

I had the same experience with the SkyHigh except mine didn't rise as much icon_sad.gif
Thanks for the very detailed review. I wonder if it's alright with everyone that I do cupcakes then, since most people didn't do cupcakes.

Lita829 Posted 7 Jun 2009 , 11:50am
post #109 of 424

Go for it, Cupcakeshoppe icon_smile.gif

cakesweetiecake Posted 7 Jun 2009 , 1:12pm
post #110 of 424

This thread is making my mouth water!! LOL! I absolutely love Toba's cake. However, I think that I am going to give a few of the other recipes (in this thread) a try!

artscallion Posted 7 Jun 2009 , 1:31pm
post #111 of 424

I usually use Toba's yellow cake or another recipe of my own. But based on what I'm reading here, I decided to try Sylvia's recipe. I've got two 9" and three 6" in the oven right now. I intend to freeze them all (except one of the 6") for a cake I have due in 2 weeks. I'll report back in a few weeks on how it stands up to freezing as compared to the one I don't freeze.

CourtneysSweets Posted 7 Jun 2009 , 8:03pm
post #112 of 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by AKA_cupcakeshoppe

TheCasualKitchen, i would love to get a copy of that comparison chart. summer_wine23@yahoo.com

I had the same experience with the SkyHigh except mine didn't rise as much icon_sad.gif
Thanks for the very detailed review. I wonder if it's alright with everyone that I do cupcakes then, since most people didn't do cupcakes.


That's something I'm into as well.

moreCakePlz Posted 7 Jun 2009 , 10:36pm
post #113 of 424

Hi folks, I gave Serious Cakes Yellow Cake a try. Here are my impressions.


Texture: Fine crumb, very tender, dense, almost velvety feel. Held together nicely when cut, did not crumble.

Moistness: Very moist. Top and bottom of the cake were sticky, but the sides were crunchy. I think I baked it a little too long (I over bake everything), but even over baked it was still moist enough.

Flavor: A little lacking in flavor (but I paired it with chocolate frosting which made the cake perfect). I think it needs more vanilla and also some butter extract (especially since it uses shortening instead of butter). 


Ease of preparation: Medium. I didnt see directions associated with the recipe, so I whipped the egg whites separate and folded them in at the end. 


Cost: Average. I used only supermarket brands. 


Other comments: The top domed during baking and then sank to near flat after removing from the oven. I over baked it (oops) to the point where the sides pulled away from the pan and no crumbs came out on the toothpick. I removed the cakes from the pans after three minutes of cooling and after an hour I wrapped in plastic wrap for overnight storage on the counter. I frosted the next morning and served the cake late in the afternoon. Everyone thought the cake was great tasting and moist enough, but the observant folks noticed that most of the flavor came from the frosting.

Overall Rating: 8 out of 10. I liked the cake and plan to try it again, but next time Ill add more vanilla, include butter extract, and try more baking powder for a little extra lift and airiness.
LL
LL
LL

artscallion Posted 7 Jun 2009 , 11:37pm
post #114 of 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by sayhellojana

Casual Kitchen - That is so weird. My cake's didn't pull from the sides of the pan, and certainly didn't look overbaked, so I doubt that was it. I doublechecked the recipe and I didn't leave anything out. Maybe it's the size of the egg yolks? I used large eggs, but the yolks didn't look very big to me. I guess this just shows how recipes are different for everyone?




Though I'm not officially in this test, I was inspired to make both Sylvia's recipe and the All-Occasion Downy Yellow today. I got the same results as you did on the Downy. This cake was very light, dry and crumbly. In fact, I couldn't even stick a fork in, break off a piece and lift it. Whatever I broke off with the fork just crumbled apart and fell off the fork on the way to my mouth.

I'm a trained pastry chef, so I know the exact moment a cake is done. I weigh my ingredients, use everything at room temp, etc. I'm positive I made this cake accurately and correctly. And I don't doubt anyone else's abilities here. So who knows? Go figure. Maybe we're all getting the same results but just perceiving them differently.
But this one definitely went in the bin.

Sylvia Weinstock's, on the other hand, reminded me of why I am exclusively a scratch baker. You just cannot get that kind of refined, delectable, quality result out of a box. I don't care what anyone says. superb!

maryjsgirl Posted 8 Jun 2009 , 3:10am
post #115 of 424

I've been so jealous of all this baking going on and me with no eggs or buttermilk! Will be getting to the grocery tomorrow so I will be back on the grind!

maryjsgirl Posted 8 Jun 2009 , 3:15am
post #116 of 424

I am copying and pasting my review for the white on white buttermilk cake since it was added to the list. The cake isn't actually as white as the photo. I had taken the photo outside in the bright sun hoping to get a better photo of the crumb.

About the recipe- This is a typical creaming, add eggs, then alternate liquid with dry type of recipe. The plus side? No whipping of the egg whites! It doesn't call for sifting either, but I did. My cake flour looked real lumpy so I thought it would be for the best.


The batter- Yum! I could taste butter, vanilla, and the tang of the buttermilk. The batter itself is thick, but really light. I had to spoon and smooth it into the cake pans.

The look- The recipe called to bake the cake at 350, but I baked mine at 325. Do not wait for the top of this cake to be springy. I took mine out while there was a slight "mush" to the top. I checked with a skewer and it came out clean. The cakes baked up absolutely flat! I made a few cupcakes to see how they would bake up. Now the cupcakes I had issues with, but I it was user error due to over filling them and baking them at 325. They actually did dome slightly, but it's hard to judge how they would have came out if I hadn't messed up. So I will say using this as a cupcake recipe is still up in the air. The cakes didn't rise very much. I baked them in a 9 in (2 in deep) and filled them a little less than half full. They baked up about an eighth inch short of the rim of the pan.


The taste- Lol, I gave a cupcake to my four year old. His response? "mom it taste a little bit like walnuts". To me it tastes like one of those puffy, buttermilk sugar cookies.


The texture- It is very tender and light. I read that the cake wasn't sturdy enough for carving etc. A couple of hours in the fridge and it was fine for torting and carving for me. When at room temperature it did get slightly more delicate, but nothing a serrated knife couldn't handle. On a moisture scale of 1-10 I would give it a seven. This cake held up after two days of being wrapped in siran wrap. It was still moist and flavorful maybe even more so.


Negatives- Pockets in the baked cake. I think this was my fault though. I didn't do anything to knock out the air pockets.


Overall I would give the cake an eight out of ten for a white/butter cake.

Here is a picture of the cake sliced...
Image

cakesweetiecake Posted 8 Jun 2009 , 1:06pm
post #117 of 424

[quote="artscallion"]

Quote:
Originally Posted by sayhellojana

Sylvia Weinstock's, on the other hand, reminded me of why I am exclusively a scratch baker. You just cannot get that kind of refined, delectable, quality result out of a box. I don't care what anyone says. superb!




So, what rating what you give this cake?

All of these great reviews!! I have to try Sylvia's cake out!! I cant wait until I have some free time!!


Maryjsgirl, that looks delicious.

moreCakePlz Posted 8 Jun 2009 , 1:24pm
post #118 of 424

[quote="cakesweetiecake"]

Quote:
Originally Posted by artscallion

Quote:
Originally Posted by sayhellojana

Sylvia Weinstock's, on the other hand, reminded me of why I am exclusively a scratch baker. You just cannot get that kind of refined, delectable, quality result out of a box. I don't care what anyone says. superb!



So, what rating what you give this cake?

All of these great reviews!! I have to try Sylvia's cake out!! I cant wait until I have some free time!!


Maryjsgirl, that looks delicious.




Wait.... I'm not seeing Maryjsgirl's picture! Is it just me icon_cry.gif
CasualKitchen, can I also get a copy of you comparison spreadsheet? I'm addicted to charts and comparisons too. A few months ago I was into Red Velvet cakes and I made a spreadsheet with about 10 different recipes so I could see how they differed. I'm one exciting mama.

artscallion Posted 8 Jun 2009 , 2:05pm
post #119 of 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by cakesweetiecake

Quote:
Originally Posted by artscallion

Sylvia Weinstock's, on the other hand, reminded me of why I am exclusively a scratch baker. You just cannot get that kind of refined, delectable, quality result out of a box. I don't care what anyone says. superb!



So, what rating what you give this cake?




I'd give it a 9.5 out of 10, because I never give anything a 10 so that there's always chance something better will come along.

This cake has such a presence that I think it would best be served on its own with just a simple compliment of plain sweetened whipped cream. Anything else would distract from it.

side note...I taste tested these cakes plain, with no frosting. I think this is the fairest way to judge them.

Lita829 Posted 8 Jun 2009 , 2:14pm
post #120 of 424

Artscallion, I may do that next time....test them without fillings or frosting. I think that your right....it is the fairest way to sample and compare recipes. Or....maybe I'll just frost and fill with the same frosting/fillings next time thumbs_up.gif
I may try Serious Cakes and Toba Garret's recipe, also. It all depends on time.

Hope y'all had a good weekend icon_biggrin.gif
BTW...I know it's a little early, but does anyone want to volunteer to be results tabulator?

Quote by @%username% on %date%

%body%